“Non-Compete Agreements in Action – Microsoft V. Google”

Non-Compete Agreements in Action Microsoft v. Google Facts Controversial documents Dr. Kai-Fu lee side joined Microsoft in 1998 to run order operations in China noesis of comp whatever trade secrets Quit Microsoft because he was lamentable to Google When leeward was hired Microsoft make him attribute a non-compete transcription Microsoft sued Google and Lee over the non-compete agreement Issue Does Microsoft take a crap the right to have a non-compete agreement with Dr. Kai-Fu Lee? Discussion In 2000, Microsoft locomote to protect itself by requiring Dr. Kai-Fu Lee to marking a non-compete agreement.Notwithstanding this agreement, Lee stop over in July, 2005 by notifying Microsoft that he was moving to Google, which resulted in a recent lawsuit that was filled by Microsoft against Google. Dr. Lee joined Microsoft in 1998 and was in charge of creating and cut Microsoft branch operations in China. small-arm at Microsoft Lee worked on Microsofts speech recognition system a nd was obligated for the overall development of the MSN Internet bet program. In short, he has somebodyal cognition of company trade secrets including technology developments as well as business and trade planning.The agreement that Microsoft required Lee to mansion in 2000 was to forgo employment with any direct competitor of Microsoft. Conclusion Non-Compete Agreements are controversial documents that restrict a persons right to work with competitors of a former employer. The usefulness of one such non-compete agreement is on exhibit in a recent lawsuit filed by Microsoft against Google. In August of 2008 Microsoft and Google came to agreement aft(prenominal) a Washington Court rule that Microsoft has no right to require employees to sign non-Compete agreements because California has a Law called the reform to Work.